Attorney is taken into custody for not requesting an interpreter for his client's trial
Example Using an Interpreter
During a Meeting
This document was prepared by the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. You can find a link to the original document on the LINKS page.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Examining Witnesses Through an Interpreter
The following suggestions are made by the Interpreters Office of the Southern District of New York, in the spirit of aiding communication in the courtroom.
Examining a witness through an interpreter is not identical to examining a witness directly: when moving between languages, the possibilities for misunderstanding, confusion, inexactitude or error increase substantially. Generally, extra time and patience are needed to prepare a non-English speaker to testify.
In court, American lawyers speak legalese ("I'm moving to sever”), not every-day English. While many Americans are bewildered by legal proceedings, people from other countries are even more at a loss because legal systems vary from country to country. In-court hearings, for example, are not commonly held in Roman law countries, where most legal issues are decided on the papers. Many terms used in U.S. courts are unfamiliar to foreigners: i.e., grand jury, jury selection, charge to the jury, etc. for the simple reason that there is no parallel concept or procedure in foreign legal systems. An interpreter will convey these terms in the closest equivalent (e.g., indictment will be called a 'formal accusation' or 'accusation by the Grand Jury') but on no account is an interpreter permitted to offer explanations of procedure because the interpreter's code of ethics prohibits giving legal advice.
Early on in a case, an attorney would do well to clarify to the witness or defendant the various stages the case will pass through and how long each stage may take.
People perceive the honesty and seriousness of legal proceedings differently, depending on a variety of factors and experiences. In countries with a tradition of corruption, bribery or judiciary inefficiency, the population has learned not to set great store by what happens in court. The American justice system is not universally revered, either, and may appear artificial, inflexible or absurd. Attitude toward the legal system may affect a witness's demeanor when testifying.
Among the foreign-born, mastery of English varies a great deal, and for matters of great seriousness, such as legal proceedings, defendants or witnesses frequently request an interpreter, if only to make them feel more secure.
The best interpreters will allow you to follow the natural rhythm of questioning, and will at the same time convey some of the "flavor" of the witness, contributing to a sensation that you are hearing the witness directly, despite the language barrier.
Getting the Right Interpreter for the Job
Active court interpreters polish their skills every day, and generally, the more experience they have, the better they become. However, interpreters can also develop bad habits or have attitude problems. Some people who work as interpreters do it as an occasional sideline and are not well versed in the legal field. Interpreting ability and style vary, depending on experience, knowledge and attitude. Stress on an interpreter "to get it right" is significant and even greater when a case is high profile. An excellent interpreter should have years of experience, be pleasant to work with, have good recall, smooth delivery, no hemming and hawing, call no attention to himself, and express no opinion on the merits of a case.
Consecutive interpretation is that done in Q and A format and differs from simultaneous in that it requires a different set of mental reflexes. Skill levels, interpreting style, and memory capacity vary, so it is wise to choose carefully the interpreter you will use with a witness. Some interpreters have better short-term memory, and will pause or interrupt less. Some are better than others in diction, performance ability, idiomatic expressions, street slang, or legal jargon. If you work through an Interpreters Office or coordinator, tell that person of any concerns or past experiences so as to avoid a repetition of problems.
In choosing an interpreter, it is best to plan ahead. If plans are not made until the day before, you will likely get a last-minute, patchwork arrangement, especially inadvisable if a witness will be testifying for a long period of time (a day or more). Freelance interpreters who work regularly in court are flexible, but cannot ignore other commitments when trial schedules change without notice. Interpreters are paid for their time, whether or not they are actually interpreting, so waiting time is costly.
If the testimony will be more than brief (over an hour), two interpreters should be assigned to rotate with the witness, so that the interpreter's mental fatigue does not adversely affect the accuracy of the testimony.
Most Important Step: Prep
Making arrangements for an interpreter is only the first step; then both the witness and interpreter need to be prepped for what will ensue.
What to Tell the Interpreter
Since words are interpreted not in isolation but in context, for reasons of logic an interpreter needs to have a broad-brush idea of the case. If you take a few minutes to brief the interpreter before starting the assignment, it will help avoid confusion later on, so that the interpreter doesn't imagine another scenario, which may be likely but inapplicable.
The essential material for the interpreter to see ahead of time: a copy of the major case documents such as the complaint, indictment, prior testimony, or relevant tape transcripts.
To ensure continuity and quality, inform the interpreter of when you will be needing an interpreter, for how long, in what type of proceeding, and for whom.
Attorney Checklist for Interpreted Testimony
When briefing the interpreter, be sure to mention:
1. What the case is about: names and nicknames, places, overall plot; what piece of the proceeding the interpreter will be needed for;
2. Any documents likely to be referred to or shown to the witness;
3. Where the witness is from, how many years he or she has lived in U.S. (The witness may use some Anglicisms, whether correctly or incorrectly, and the interpreter should be forewarned);
4. Educational level of witness, any speech defects or particularities;
5. Numbers that may come up: addresses, amount of drugs or money, telephone numbers that will repeatedly be referred to, account numbers, etc.;
6. Any physical evidence that will be referred to or shown to the witness;
7. Any emotional factors that may affect the witness's concentration or delivery: mental problems, fear, jumpiness, etc.;
8. Any key words (descriptions, disputed dialog, slang, code words, etc.) that may be elicited in the testimony.
What to Tell Witnesses Who Will Testify Through an Interpreter
Interpreters are not immune to mistakes, slips of the tongue, mental blanks, or memory lapses. If an error in interpretation occurs, it should be corrected as soon as possible, hopefully without causing undue embarrassment to the interpreter.
If a problem persists, it may be on account of technical or culture-bound phraseology: Does the witness know what you mean by "pre-trial proceedings?" Does your question include terms of art, cant, legalese, intentional sarcasm or ambiguity? Perhaps the witness is unfamiliar with units of measurement, directions (north, south), or neighborhood names, which are often expressed differently in other cultures. Punctuality, concept of time, and precision about time are valued differently in different cultures. An ambiguous answer may be the result of an ambiguous question. The answer may be culture-bound rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead. In some cultures, it is considered polite to be verbose. In other cultures, especially in the Far East, it is polite to assent, but that is different from an affirmative answer: a "yes" answer may be equivalent to saying "Yes, I'm hearing you (but don't necessarily agree)." A questioner would do well to bear these cultural and psychological differences in mind so that the wrong impression is not created for the jury.
Types of Error
The examples that follow will all be in English for illustrative purposes, but of course when rendered through an interpreter the questions are interpreted from English to a foreign language and the answers, from a foreign language into English.
The error that most concerns us is the material error, or error of substance.
A substantive error would be "It was a blue car" when the witness said "It was a red car" or "I had 2 kilos" when the witness said "I had 12 kilos." This is also known as lexical error (wrong word).
Another type of substantive error is called contra-sens, [French for "contradictory meaning"] where the interpretation conveys the exact opposite of what the speaker said; e.g., the witness says "I don't know" and the interpreter renders it as "I know."
Other categories of interpreter error are:
1. Wholesale omission of parts of the question or parts of the answer
A: "And then when I went downstairs, I mean upstairs, because the house had two floors, I heard something."
A: [through interpreter] "Then I heard something upstairs."
2. Distortion of meaning
A: "I was never convicted in that case."
A: [through interpreter] "I never got sentenced in that case."
3. Unfamiliar idiom
A: "She was afraid of dying."
A: [through interpreter] "She was scared to death."
4. Errors in what is called "register conservation," or appropriate level
Q: "Wouldn't they rat you out if they knew?"
Q: [through interpreter] "Wouldn't they talk about you if they knew?"
(However, it would not be wrong to interpret the question as "Wouldn't they tell on you if they knew?”)
5. Inclusion or elimination of "politeness markers”: e.g., it would be wrong if in interpreting the question "Where were you, sir?" the interpreter omitted the word "sir." Likewise, it is wrong for an interpreter to add honorifics or polite language if it is not in the original. Sometimes interpreters do this automatically, without thinking, but it is important that an interpreter not make a witness appear more polite (or less polite) than he is.
6. Conveying hesitancy or certainty where the opposite is expressed
Q:"Don't you know for a fact he didn't do it?"
Q: [through interpreter] "Don't you think you could be mistaken?"
7. Overly literal renderings, e.g., “I crossed the frontier." for "I crossed the border."
8. Grammatical errors, e.g., "We wasn't ready."
These few examples show the room for error even in simple sentences, and illustrate the many decisions about words' meaning, impact, and level of formality that interpreters must make thousands of times a day.
Interpreter errors may be caused by: gaps in knowledge or vocabulary; lack of concentration; fatigue; distraction; mishearing; cognitive overload; low memory retention (when an interpreter can't retain all the elements of the message), or "language interference" (An example of interference would be where the interpreter inadvertently or out of ignorance chooses an expression that sounds like the word used in the original, but means something different, e.g., using deception in English for "decepción" in Spanish would be wrong, since the Spanish word means disappointment, not deception).
Experience has shown that errors of substance are sometimes in the eye of the beholder, and great hay can be made by either side from seemingly unimportant details in a case. In any event, the burden is on the objecting party to show that an error has been made.
How to Correct the Record
If there appears to be a problem with the interpretation, request a side bar and include the interpreter, who will make a correction for the record if one is necessary. If there is disagreement about the correct interpretation of a word or phrase, the judge will instruct the parties on how to proceed. An interpreter should not be dismissed outright due to a mistaken word or phrase, because it is impossible for anyone to know all words or variants of language usage.
Other Professional Considerations
AN INTERPRETER MAY ASK TO APPROACH
An interpreter may on rare occasion ask to approach the bench for a sidebar if a language issue has come up that may lead to a miscarriage of justice, or in the event that further clarification is required from the court as to how to proceed.
GESTURES BY THE WITNESS
Interpreters should not repeat or characterize any gestures made by the witness. It is up to the attorney to describe for the record what the witness has indicated. If a gesture is very culture-specific, the witness can be asked directly what a particular gesture means in his culture.
EXPRESSING OPINIONS ON OTHER INTERPRETERS' ACCURACY
Court interpreters should not offer or be asked to express an opinion on any other interpreter's accuracy unless the request comes from the judge. In the normal course, interpreters will consult or send notes to each other on terminology usage. A "checking" interpreter should not also be engaged in interpreting the very same proceeding. The court interpreters providing the simultaneous interpretation should never be called as witnesses, unless the judge specifically requests them to. Slight variations in the way interpreters render certain expressions are to be expected, and no two interpreters will coincide exactly in all their renditions.
TRANSLATIONS TO BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE
Just as tape transcripts must be prepared ahead of time, any translation to be introduced into evidence should be done ahead of time. It is not a good idea to ask the interpreter to provide a sight translation of anything other than a simple or boilerplate document. The language of many legal documents is dense and syntactically complex, and to prepare an official translation, a translator needs to have reference material at hand and review it several times in order to produce a well-written text. Translation always takes longer than anyone expects, so please allow the translator to do the job properly. Translators who take pride in their work will not hand in an unrefined copy.
There is no legal requirement that documents be translated by a certified interpreter; although some courts have a standard practice to request that certified interpreters prepare the translations. The Court Interpreter's Act (28 USC 1827) does not specifically provide for the translation of documents by certified interpreters.
When seeking translators, it is advisable to give as much detail about the job as possible in advance, to specify the format in which you wish to receive the translation (diskette, hard copy, columns, etc.), and to request an estimate before the translator begins the assignment. Many attorneys are surprised by the cost of translation, but have little awareness of how long it takes to do. Translations cannot be done word for word, but concept for concept, and a lot of structural reformulation must be done when transferring thought from one language to another. For this very reason, a machine is incapable of producing a reliable translation. Keep in mind that a sloppy translation is worse than none at all, because most of the time it will have to be redone, and the cost in the end will be double for the same product.
Tape transcripts are very time-consuming to produce, and nearly equally time consuming if one interpreter is checking another interpreter's work. The general estimate is that for every minute of tape (assuming good audibility) an interpreter needs 30 to 60 minutes to listen, transcribe and translate.
At the outset, a defense attorney ought to get an idea from the interpreter about how long it would take to complete the assignment (often the interpreter will not be able to tell until listening to a sample of the tape) and what the estimated cost would be. In most districts, defense attorneys need prior authorization from the judge for this.
When requesting transcripts to be prepared or reviewed, attorneys should also be sure to specify exactly what they want to accomplish: get a general idea of the content of conversations, get a general opinion on accuracy, see if their client is mentioned, or prepare a transcript to introduce into evidence.
In general, experienced interpreters have special equipment that can slow down the tape speed if needed, and must listen to tapes many times in order to be sure of what was said.
Be sure to ask the interpreter's experience with producing tape transcripts: how many they have done, whether they have worked for both defense and prosecution, whether they have ever testified as an expert witness, etc.
Last updated 09-Feb-2004 3:25 pm
This video shows a female interpreter performing consecutive interpreting. She waits for each speaker to finish his/her statement, and then interprets into the non-English language. This is the type of interpreting that must be used for an interview. The interpreter has to sometimes retain great sections of a statement and takes notes in order to render accurately. The interpreter also has to manage the pace of the conversation without interrupting too frequently.
Consecutive interpreting is also used in telephonic interpreting. During a narration the interpreter may use the simultaneous mode.
CODE OF ETHICS
Interpreters must abide by a strict code of ethics and understand their professional responsibilities. Failure to do so may result in the interpreter's suspension or dismissal. These principles are practiced by all types of interpreters.
Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities for Court Interpreters
(a) Preamble: Many persons who come before the courts are non- or limited-English speakers. The function of court interpreters and translators is to remove the language barrier to the extent possible, so that such persons’ access to justice is the same as that of similarly situated English speakers for whom no such barrier exists. The degree of trust that is placed in court interpreters and the magnitude of their responsibility necessitate high, uniform ethical standards that will both guide and protect court interpreters in the course of their duties as well as uphold the standards of the profession as a whole. Interpreters are highly skilled professionals who fulfill an essential role in the administration of justice. (b) Applicability: This code shall guide and be binding upon all persons, agencies and organizations who administer, supervise use, or deliver interpreting services to the judiciary. This code is therefore intended not only to set forth fundamental ethical precepts for court interpreters to follow, but also to encourage them to develop their own, well-informed ethical judgment.
CANON 1: ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS. Interpreters shall render a complete and accurate interpretation or sight translation, without altering, omitting, or adding anything to what is stated or written, and without explanation. The register, style and tone of the source language should be conserved. While interpreting or translating, court interpreters are to use the same grammatical person as the speaker. Guessing should be avoided. Interpreter errors should be corrected for the record as soon as possible.
CANON 2: REPRESENTATION OF QUALIFICATIONS. Interpreters shall accurately and completely represent their certifications, accreditation, training, education, and pertinent experience. Court interpreters shall bring to the judge’s attention any circumstances or conditions that impede full compliance with any canon of this code, including, but not limited to: interpreter fatigue, inability to hear, or inadequate knowledge of specialized terminology, and must decline assignments under conditions that make such compliance unattainable. Acceptance of a case by an interpreter conveys linguistic competency in legal settings.
CANON 3: IMPARTIALITY AND AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Interpreters shall be impartial and unbiased and shall refrain from conduct that may give an appearance of bias. Interpreters shall immediately disclose to the Court and all parties any real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest. Interpreters shall abstain from comment on cases in which they serve. An interpreter who is also an attorney should not serve in both capacities in the same matter, unless agreed to by the judge and all parties.
CANON 4: PROFESSIONAL DEMEANOR. Interpreters shall conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the court and shall be as unobtrusive as possible.
CANON 5: CONFIDENTIALITY. Interpreters shall not disclose privileged or confidential communications or information acquired in the course of interpreting or preparing for interpretation, unless authorized by the Court or by law.
CANON 6: SCOPE OF PRACTICE. Interpreters shall limit themselves to interpreting or translating, and shall not give legal advice, express personal opinions to individuals for whom they are interpreting, or engage in any other activities which may be construed to constitute a service other than interpreting or translating while serving as an interpreter. An interpreter may convey legal advice including the explanation of forms and/or services to a person only while an attorney is giving it.
CANON 7: ASSESSING AND REPORTING IMPEDIMENTS TO PERFORMANCE. Interpreters shall assess at all times their ability to deliver their services. When interpreters have any reservation about their ability to satisfy an assignment competently, they shall immediately convey that reservation to the judge.
CANON 8: DUTY TO REPORT ETHICAL VIOLATIONS. Interpreters shall report to the judge any effort to influence or impede the performance of their duty, or their compliance with any legal requirement, any provision of this code, or any other official policy governing court interpreting. An interpreter having knowledge that another interpreter has committed a violation of any provision of this code shall inform the judge and/or the appropriate licensing authority.
CANON 9: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. Interpreters shall continually improve their skills and knowledge and advance the profession through activities such as professional training and education, and interaction with colleagues and specialists in related fields. Interpreters should keep informed of all statutes, rules of courts and policies of the judicial system that relate to the performance of their professional duties.
SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETING IN COURT WITH WIRELESS EQUIPMENT
This video shows the interpreter (woman in the pink jacket) interpreting softly into a microphone for the defendant who is hearing only her words through headphones.The prosecuting attorney speaks slowly and pauses often to allow the interpreter to render the non-English version of his speech accurately. The attorney mentions details of the horrific event, clearly exemplifying the strength of professional interpreters to remain composed. Simultaneous interpreting is also used in conference interpreting.
WHAT ATTORNEYS SHOULD KNOW WHEN WORKING WITH INTERPRETERS
This file was created by the Administrative Office of the
Courts, Court Interpreter Program of Delaware. It is a great tool for judges, lawyers, clerks, and new interpreters to become familiar with the role and duties of the
BEST PRACTICES FOR ATTORNEYS WORKING WITH COURT INTERPRETERS
State of Delaware Administrative Office of the Courts-Court Interpreter Program
Non-English-speaking witness testimony is interpreted in the consecutive mode; that is, the interpreter will hear the entire question before interpreting it to the witness. The interpreter will then wait for the complete response before rendering the interpretation into English, out loud and for the record. A good, experienced interpreter will allow a natural question-answer rhythm and will preserve the witness persona.
To ensure best possible delivery, counsel shall:
A good, experienced interpreter:
"Interpreting is interpreting"...
Is it really
all the same?
As an interpreter I provided services in many places and had the opportunity to work and chat with dozens of spoken-language professionals. Some loved court interpreting's criminal matters, others preferred working with medical material or in hospitals, and some would never change conference interpreting for any other type of interpreting no matter how daring or prestigious. My first interpreting work was in the medical field. I loved it. I had grown up reading about diseases, studying anatomy, and watching Quincy; I loved everything from physiology to forensics... in any language. One day in court, a colleague was preparing for a lecture on medical interpreting. "Why? I asked. You're a court interpreter and don't even like medical work." "Interpreting is interpreting," the court interpreter responded. I was quiet, thinking: Hmm...The code of ethics extends to all types of interpreters. Canons such as confidentiality and accuracy must be upheld, as well as professional demeanor. “I guess you’re right,” I responded.
Now that I have somewhat more experience i think that i would respond differently to that comment. Obviously, there are differences in terminology and procedure, but the spirit of the interpretation is not exactly the same in the medical and court interpreting fields. The difference is ]much more than Medical interpreters allowing themselves to act as cultural brokers or convey a need for clarification if they perceive the message isn't understood; misunderstandings in the medical field could affect a patients' health and well-being. When interpreting in court, it is the LEP's duty to request a lower register if he or she does not understand. The LEP, in court, must be diligent, aware, and ensure his or her own understanding. I was aware of these similarities and distinctions but hadn't really questioned if they were merely distinctions in the practice of the professions, while the essence of the remained one, the same. The mind set in court and medical interpreting are not the same and the interpreter must prepare before a session to ensure he or she does not violate the code of ethics of each profession. Working and training strictly in one field and expecting to organically merge or expand into another with minimal training would be unwise. Observation and shadowing are helpful in understanding the role of the interpreter in each field of work, as well as learning to recognize stress and secondary trauma sometimes suffered by interpreters involved in cases of abuse and violence.
Video Remote Interpreting